🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an event that began as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between Black populations worldwide, has developed a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass events where individuals of African heritage are paid to talk to white audiences about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The wave has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Month

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The period has evolved since that time, placing less emphasis on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and more on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the celebration is commemorated is a indication of the political moment. How it develops is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we witnessed the largest far-right rally in British history. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a member of parliament gains confidence to state that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in the European continent as a whole.

In the America, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A drive to remove African American heritage and legacy from the archives is in progress. One of the former president's first executive orders targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the observance illustrates how minimally it can be impactful if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content celebrations of historical achievements, rather than confronting the conditions of the contemporary world. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is necessary. A university professor, a educator at a learning establishment, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just discontinue events including Black History Month altogether, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an period that has not worked.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an infrastructure that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is distributed through the year (as some institutions are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not avoid politics, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has mere awareness of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Establishments who mark it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to subtle slights, but confronted with the threats that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and adaptive. Maybe an total re-identification is required – Black History is Now Month.